Th parent and child outcomes. Individual child characteristics can also affect treatment outcomes. These individual characteristics may include a wide range of features such as language ability, cognition, and severity of ASD. This heterogeneity may account for findings that parent-mediated interventions have had very limited effects on child outcomes. Child treatment gains have been limited to particular subgroups, such as those entering the intervention with the greatest impairment, or those identified as displaying greater pre-intervention object interest (Carter et al, 2011; Siller, Hutman Sigman, 2013). Overall, there is a need to identify other parent-mediated interventions for young children with ASD that are more robust in significantly improving parent and child outcomes. This comparative efficacy study attempts to advance intervention research by testing whether a parent-mediated intervention involving direct parent coaching with the child is more efficacious than a parent-education model (without direct involvement of the child) in improving parent and child outcomes. The study treatments were added to existing early intervention services, controlling for type and dose of these services. All of the children were toddlers with ASD, between the ages of 22 and 36 months, and attended the same 30hour per week, early-intervention program. Families attending the early-intervention program were randomized to receive either one hour per week of parent training based on a manualized parent psychoeducation program for parents of children with autism (Psychoeducational Intervention -PEI; Brereton Tonge, 2005) or a hands-on manualized, parent-mediated program aimed at improving core deficits in their toddlers (Joint Attention Symbolic Play, Engagement, and Regulation-JASPER, UCLA, 2005, unpublished manual). Controlling for the get POR-8 overall dose of intervention, we compared the approaches on the primary outcome of joint engagement between parent and child. Joint engagement, as defined, requires the active and BQ-123 web reciprocal engagement of both parent and child. Secondary measures included child-initiated joint attention, functional and symbolic play types (reflecting play flexibility and diversity), play level, and generalization of joint engagement to the child’s classroom. We hypothesized that improvements in child engagement with objects and people, joint attention gestures, and play skills would be significantly greater in the JASPER condition as compared to the PEI condition. Because one focus of the PEI condition is on reducing parent stress, we also hypothesized that stress would be reduced to a greater extent for parents in the PEI condition relative to the JASPER condition. Child and parent measures were collected prior to intervention (Pre-Treatment), at the end of intervention (Post-Treatment), and at 6 months follow-up.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptJ Consult Clin Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 June 01.Kasari et al.PageMethodsParticipants Participants were recruited from the same outpatient early intervention (EI) program consisting of 30 hours per week of a combination of behavioral, speech, and occupational therapies for 10 weeks. A University Institutional Review Board approved the study and parents provided written consent. Children were included if they were younger than 36 months, had a clinical diagnosis of ASD confirmed by independent testers with the Autism Diagnosti.Th parent and child outcomes. Individual child characteristics can also affect treatment outcomes. These individual characteristics may include a wide range of features such as language ability, cognition, and severity of ASD. This heterogeneity may account for findings that parent-mediated interventions have had very limited effects on child outcomes. Child treatment gains have been limited to particular subgroups, such as those entering the intervention with the greatest impairment, or those identified as displaying greater pre-intervention object interest (Carter et al, 2011; Siller, Hutman Sigman, 2013). Overall, there is a need to identify other parent-mediated interventions for young children with ASD that are more robust in significantly improving parent and child outcomes. This comparative efficacy study attempts to advance intervention research by testing whether a parent-mediated intervention involving direct parent coaching with the child is more efficacious than a parent-education model (without direct involvement of the child) in improving parent and child outcomes. The study treatments were added to existing early intervention services, controlling for type and dose of these services. All of the children were toddlers with ASD, between the ages of 22 and 36 months, and attended the same 30hour per week, early-intervention program. Families attending the early-intervention program were randomized to receive either one hour per week of parent training based on a manualized parent psychoeducation program for parents of children with autism (Psychoeducational Intervention -PEI; Brereton Tonge, 2005) or a hands-on manualized, parent-mediated program aimed at improving core deficits in their toddlers (Joint Attention Symbolic Play, Engagement, and Regulation-JASPER, UCLA, 2005, unpublished manual). Controlling for the overall dose of intervention, we compared the approaches on the primary outcome of joint engagement between parent and child. Joint engagement, as defined, requires the active and reciprocal engagement of both parent and child. Secondary measures included child-initiated joint attention, functional and symbolic play types (reflecting play flexibility and diversity), play level, and generalization of joint engagement to the child’s classroom. We hypothesized that improvements in child engagement with objects and people, joint attention gestures, and play skills would be significantly greater in the JASPER condition as compared to the PEI condition. Because one focus of the PEI condition is on reducing parent stress, we also hypothesized that stress would be reduced to a greater extent for parents in the PEI condition relative to the JASPER condition. Child and parent measures were collected prior to intervention (Pre-Treatment), at the end of intervention (Post-Treatment), and at 6 months follow-up.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptJ Consult Clin Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 June 01.Kasari et al.PageMethodsParticipants Participants were recruited from the same outpatient early intervention (EI) program consisting of 30 hours per week of a combination of behavioral, speech, and occupational therapies for 10 weeks. A University Institutional Review Board approved the study and parents provided written consent. Children were included if they were younger than 36 months, had a clinical diagnosis of ASD confirmed by independent testers with the Autism Diagnosti.