Arameter estimate or positive slope of the regression line) with participant-specific and action-specific scores for Urge and other confounding factors (i.e. Familiarity, Difficulty and Rhythm) were identified separately for observation and imitation conditions. The statistical Win 63843 site threshold was set to P < 0.001 and corrected to P < 0.05 for multiple comparisons using cluster size (Friston et al., 1996). The primary purpose of this study was to clarify which neural cortical areas exhibited activation that positively correlated with Urge score rather than other confounding factors. Therefore, exclusive masks involved in other confounding factors (i.e. Familiarity, Difficulty and Rhythm) were used to examine Urge-specific areas (non-overlapping areas). The statistical threshold of exclusive masks was set at P < 0.001, and was intended to reveal regions where one contrast did not overlap with those from one or more different contrasts. In addition to identifying areas that positively correlated with Urge, the neural networks underlying Urge and imitation performance were also assessed using PPI (Friston et al., 1997). This study identified aspects of the right supplementary motor area (SMA) and bilateral midcingulate cortex (MCC) that were specific to Urge under the imitation condition. The SMA was expected to have a strong connection with mirror areas (e.g. premotor cortices and parietal cortices), and thus, a PPI regressorwas created (SMA ?Imitation-Observation) to determine which regions were more highly correlated with the SMA under the imitation condition than under the observation condition. A peak voxel of the right SMA cluster (8, ?4, 66) identified by correlation analysis with Urge as a seed voxel was used to accomplish this. The statistical threshold was set at P < 0.001 and corrected to P < 0.05 for multiple comparisons using cluster size.Post hoc analysesTo confirm that neural correlates of Urge were not due to some specific kinematic characteristics of the action, multiple regression analyses were conducted. Because there were four kinematic factors (Speed, Key motion, Motion type and Symmetry), and the individual action contained a combination of these kinematic factors, multiple regression analyses were conducted separately. Each of the four kinematic factors possessed various sub-categorical levels: Speed had two levels, Key motion had nine levels, Motion type had three levels and Symmetry had four levels. In the four multiple regression models for the four kinematic characteristics of the individual action, Urge was orthogonalized against the other levels, allowing identification of the remaining effect in the models, which was designated the Urge-specific effect. Moreover, in a similar manner, additional multiple regression analyses were conducted to provide further confirmation on the Urge-specific areas and reject the effects of explicit reasons (Difficulty, Rhythm, Familiarity and Urge). Urge was also orthogonalized against other parameters. The statistical threshold was set at P < 0.005 and the voxel size at k > 10 due to concerns about type II errors (i.e. missing true effects; Lieberman and Cunningham, 2009).ResultsBehavioral dataIn the fMRI experiment, Urge showed significant correlations with Familiarity and Rhythm (Urge and Familiarity, correlation coefficient ??.20 to ?0.94, order Chaetocin median ?0.40, t[36] ?6.89, P < 0.001, two-tailed; Urge and Rhythm, correlation coefficient ??.25 to ?0.83, median ?0.32, t[36] ?7.40, P < 0.001.Arameter estimate or positive slope of the regression line) with participant-specific and action-specific scores for Urge and other confounding factors (i.e. Familiarity, Difficulty and Rhythm) were identified separately for observation and imitation conditions. The statistical threshold was set to P < 0.001 and corrected to P < 0.05 for multiple comparisons using cluster size (Friston et al., 1996). The primary purpose of this study was to clarify which neural cortical areas exhibited activation that positively correlated with Urge score rather than other confounding factors. Therefore, exclusive masks involved in other confounding factors (i.e. Familiarity, Difficulty and Rhythm) were used to examine Urge-specific areas (non-overlapping areas). The statistical threshold of exclusive masks was set at P < 0.001, and was intended to reveal regions where one contrast did not overlap with those from one or more different contrasts. In addition to identifying areas that positively correlated with Urge, the neural networks underlying Urge and imitation performance were also assessed using PPI (Friston et al., 1997). This study identified aspects of the right supplementary motor area (SMA) and bilateral midcingulate cortex (MCC) that were specific to Urge under the imitation condition. The SMA was expected to have a strong connection with mirror areas (e.g. premotor cortices and parietal cortices), and thus, a PPI regressorwas created (SMA ?Imitation-Observation) to determine which regions were more highly correlated with the SMA under the imitation condition than under the observation condition. A peak voxel of the right SMA cluster (8, ?4, 66) identified by correlation analysis with Urge as a seed voxel was used to accomplish this. The statistical threshold was set at P < 0.001 and corrected to P < 0.05 for multiple comparisons using cluster size.Post hoc analysesTo confirm that neural correlates of Urge were not due to some specific kinematic characteristics of the action, multiple regression analyses were conducted. Because there were four kinematic factors (Speed, Key motion, Motion type and Symmetry), and the individual action contained a combination of these kinematic factors, multiple regression analyses were conducted separately. Each of the four kinematic factors possessed various sub-categorical levels: Speed had two levels, Key motion had nine levels, Motion type had three levels and Symmetry had four levels. In the four multiple regression models for the four kinematic characteristics of the individual action, Urge was orthogonalized against the other levels, allowing identification of the remaining effect in the models, which was designated the Urge-specific effect. Moreover, in a similar manner, additional multiple regression analyses were conducted to provide further confirmation on the Urge-specific areas and reject the effects of explicit reasons (Difficulty, Rhythm, Familiarity and Urge). Urge was also orthogonalized against other parameters. The statistical threshold was set at P < 0.005 and the voxel size at k > 10 due to concerns about type II errors (i.e. missing true effects; Lieberman and Cunningham, 2009).ResultsBehavioral dataIn the fMRI experiment, Urge showed significant correlations with Familiarity and Rhythm (Urge and Familiarity, correlation coefficient ??.20 to ?0.94, median ?0.40, t[36] ?6.89, P < 0.001, two-tailed; Urge and Rhythm, correlation coefficient ??.25 to ?0.83, median ?0.32, t[36] ?7.40, P < 0.001.