Lone (Figure 1H), we conclude that the donor fibre does not contributeHypertrophic Effect of Grafted Donor MyofibreFigure 3. A single donor myofibre injected into recipient mouse muscles promotes tert-Butylhydroquinone site muscle hypertrophy. Single fibres were grafted in mdx nude mouse muscles that had either been injured 3 days previously with BaCl2 (n = 6) (A-I), or were non-injured (n = 6) (A-II). As a control, DMEM was injected in muscles similarly injured (n = 5) (A-III) or uninjured (n = 5) (A-IV). Representative laminin-stained transverse muscle sections clearly showed that muscles grafted with single fibres (B-I and I) were macroscopically larger than muscles injected with DMEM (B-III and V). This difference was also evident in the weights of the muscles (C). The mean CSA was significantly bigger in muscles in group I compared to III and II compared to IV (D). The number of fibres was not significantly different in any of the cases (E) whilst the distribution of the fibres was changed inHypertrophic Effect of Grafted Donor Myofibremuscles injected with single fibres (F) (Chi-squared test: p,0.0001 both when distribution I was compared to III and distribution II was compared to IV). Size bar 
= 100 mm. *p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054599.gto muscle regeneration in in BaCl2-treated muscles, but it induces a hypertrophic effect.BaCl2 is not the Cause of Muscle HypertrophyTo ascertain if BaCl2 alone caused muscle hypertrophy, the right TA of mdx nude mice was injected with BaCl2 and the left TA with PBS. Transverse sections of BaCl2-injured and PBS-injected TA muscles were similar in size (Figure 2A). This lack of difference was confirmed by a similar weight of muscles treated with either BaCl2 or an equal volume of PBS (Figure 2B), a comparable CSA (Figure 2C) and a similar fibre number and distribution of the fibre sizes (Figure 2D and E). From these results, we conclude that BaCl2 alone does not promote muscle hypertrophy.A Single Donor Myofibre Promotes Muscle Hypertrophy when Injected in Recipient Mouse MusclesTo identify the cause of the observed muscle hypertrophy, a series of KDM5A-IN-1 chemical information experiments was performed (Figure 3A), in which either a single myofibre isolated from a 3F-nlacZ-2E mouse, or DMEM alone was grafted into either BaCl2 pre-injured muscles (Figure 3A I, III), or in untreated muscles (Figure 3A II, IV). From a first macroscopic comparison of laminin-stained cryosections, it was evident that muscles grafted with single fibres were bigger than those injected 15755315 with DMEM (Figure 3B). Moreover, single fibregrafted muscles were significantly heavier compared to DMEMinjected muscles, despite the absence of donor-derived muscle (Figure 3C). CSAs of pre-injured single fibre-grafted muscles were significantly increased compare to BaCl2 pre-injured and DMEMinjected muscles and a similar difference was observed without pre-injuring the muscle (Figure 3D). The number of fibres in the analysed muscles was comparable (Figure 3E) for all the conditions, but the frequency of the fibre size distribution was significantly different, with fewer small fibres and more fibres of larger calibre in muscles injected with a donor fibre (Figure 3F). We therefore conclude that the hypertrophic effect is induced by the injected donor single myofibres, even without pre-injury of the recipient muscles.D-III). BaCl2-injured and single fibre-grafted muscles not only contained no donor-derived muscle, as previously found (Figure 1B), but also no donor-derived cells outside t.Lone (Figure 1H), we conclude that the donor fibre does not contributeHypertrophic Effect of 
Grafted Donor MyofibreFigure 3. A single donor myofibre injected into recipient mouse muscles promotes muscle hypertrophy. Single fibres were grafted in mdx nude mouse muscles that had either been injured 3 days previously with BaCl2 (n = 6) (A-I), or were non-injured (n = 6) (A-II). As a control, DMEM was injected in muscles similarly injured (n = 5) (A-III) or uninjured (n = 5) (A-IV). Representative laminin-stained transverse muscle sections clearly showed that muscles grafted with single fibres (B-I and I) were macroscopically larger than muscles injected with DMEM (B-III and V). This difference was also evident in the weights of the muscles (C). The mean CSA was significantly bigger in muscles in group I compared to III and II compared to IV (D). The number of fibres was not significantly different in any of the cases (E) whilst the distribution of the fibres was changed inHypertrophic Effect of Grafted Donor Myofibremuscles injected with single fibres (F) (Chi-squared test: p,0.0001 both when distribution I was compared to III and distribution II was compared to IV). Size bar = 100 mm. *p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054599.gto muscle regeneration in in BaCl2-treated muscles, but it induces a hypertrophic effect.BaCl2 is not the Cause of Muscle HypertrophyTo ascertain if BaCl2 alone caused muscle hypertrophy, the right TA of mdx nude mice was injected with BaCl2 and the left TA with PBS. Transverse sections of BaCl2-injured and PBS-injected TA muscles were similar in size (Figure 2A). This lack of difference was confirmed by a similar weight of muscles treated with either BaCl2 or an equal volume of PBS (Figure 2B), a comparable CSA (Figure 2C) and a similar fibre number and distribution of the fibre sizes (Figure 2D and E). From these results, we conclude that BaCl2 alone does not promote muscle hypertrophy.A Single Donor Myofibre Promotes Muscle Hypertrophy when Injected in Recipient Mouse MusclesTo identify the cause of the observed muscle hypertrophy, a series of experiments was performed (Figure 3A), in which either a single myofibre isolated from a 3F-nlacZ-2E mouse, or DMEM alone was grafted into either BaCl2 pre-injured muscles (Figure 3A I, III), or in untreated muscles (Figure 3A II, IV). From a first macroscopic comparison of laminin-stained cryosections, it was evident that muscles grafted with single fibres were bigger than those injected 15755315 with DMEM (Figure 3B). Moreover, single fibregrafted muscles were significantly heavier compared to DMEMinjected muscles, despite the absence of donor-derived muscle (Figure 3C). CSAs of pre-injured single fibre-grafted muscles were significantly increased compare to BaCl2 pre-injured and DMEMinjected muscles and a similar difference was observed without pre-injuring the muscle (Figure 3D). The number of fibres in the analysed muscles was comparable (Figure 3E) for all the conditions, but the frequency of the fibre size distribution was significantly different, with fewer small fibres and more fibres of larger calibre in muscles injected with a donor fibre (Figure 3F). We therefore conclude that the hypertrophic effect is induced by the injected donor single myofibres, even without pre-injury of the recipient muscles.D-III). BaCl2-injured and single fibre-grafted muscles not only contained no donor-derived muscle, as previously found (Figure 1B), but also no donor-derived cells outside t.