237 237 2922 six 22 4 0 4 five three four 43 58 226 22 226 229 220 27 three.43 0.08 9.23 Correct temporal pole 50 0.88 8.68 7.63 Left medial prefrontal cortex 442 six.84 6.0 four.99 Left inferior frontal gyrus
237 237 2922 6 22 four 0 four 5 three four 43 58 226 22 226 229 220 27 three.43 0.08 9.23 Right temporal pole 50 0.88 8.68 7.63 Left medial prefrontal cortex 442 6.84 6.0 4.99 Left inferior frontal gyrus 68 6.40 5.52 Appropriate cerebellum 20 five.7 Left temporoparietal junction two 5.06 3.9 Appropriate medial cerebellum 33 5.00 Suitable inferior frontal gyrus 46 4.97 four.49 Precuneus 0 4.74 3.87 c) Interaction: Social agent expertise [(BodiesTraits BodiesNeutral) (NamesTraits NamesNeutral)] Left temporal pole 24 four.six Correct superior medial prefrontal cortex 33 4.04 Left superior medial prefrontal cortex 2 3.53 Left temporoparietal junction 5 three.25 254 245 five 60 five 23 22 six 25 257 24 260 248 3 48 60 23 23 25 9 29 two 26 24 23 53 53 65 20 23 282 258 258 258 23 26 252 26 2 50 32226 223 24 235 220 220 3 43 3 7 9 238 9 22 250 24 7 28 34 235 28 55The main impact of social agent (Bodies Names) is masked by the bodylocaliser (Bodies Cars); the key effect of social understanding (Traits Neutral) is masked by the ToMlocaliser (False Beliefs False Photographs); the social PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19456252 agent by social knowledge interaction [(BodiesTraits BodiesNeutral) (NamesTraits NamesNeutral)] is masked by both the body and ToM localiser. Note: Regions surviving a voxellevel threshold of P 0.005 and 0 voxels are reported. Areas in bold survive FWE cluster correction for several comparisons. Subclusters at the very least 8 mm from the most important peak are listed. The social agent by social expertise interaction is exclusively masked by the NamesNeutral NamesTraits contrast to make positive that any interaction outcome does not include things like (Neutral Traits) when paired with names.Neuroimaging dataUnivariate analyses. Main effects. There was a most important impact of social agent (Bodies Names; Ganoderic acid A Figure 3A) in bilateral OT cortices [overlapping with Extrastriate Body Area (EBA) and surviving FWE cluster correction] and bilateral FG [overlapping withFusiform Body Area (FBA) and surviving FWE cluster correction]. There was also a principal effect of social know-how (Traits Neutral; Figure 3B) in mPFC, bilateral TPs, precuneus, and left TPJ, all of which overlapped with the ToMlocaliser. The inverse contrasts for each key effects (Names Bodies and Neutral Trait) are reported in Supplementary Table S.I. M. Greven et al.Table two. Clusters revealed inside the PPI analysis for the social agent by social understanding interaction [(BodiesTraits BodiesNeutral) (NamesTraits NamesNeutral)], which can be masked by each the physique and ToM localiser Region Number T of voxels Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates x Seed area: ideal fusiform gyrus Correct temporal pole Left temporoparietal junction Left temporal pole Left temporal pole Seed area: left temporal pole Left fusiform gyrus y z 7 44.23 3.79 two.98 three.75 3.28 3.53 2.63 4.five 260 260 245 245 233 242 252 246 20 7 5 2238 9 9 223 232 226 226Note: Regions surviving a voxellevel threshold of P 0.005 and 0 voxels are reported. These results are exclusively masked by the NamesNeutral NamesTraits PPI contrast to make confident that any interaction result does not contain (Neutral Traits) when paired with names.Interaction. For the interaction among social agent and social information [(BodiesTraits BodiesNeutral) (NamesTraits NamesNeutral)] clusters emerged in left TPJ, mPFC, and left TP and all of these clusters overlapped together with the ToMlocaliser at the grouplevel (Table ; Figure 3C). The parameter estimates illustrate a higher distinction in between trait and neutral statements when bodies instead of names are prese.